Is the original Funny Games better?
Is the original Funny Games better?
While the original Funny Games has a slightly stronger audience from film purists, both are almost universally hated. Neither has a great response on Rotten Tomatoes, both have been called among the worst features of all time.
Is the Funny Games remake vs original?
Funny Games (alternatively titled Funny Games U.S.) is a 2007 psychological thriller film written and directed by Michael Haneke, and a remake of his own 1997 film of the same title.
Why did Haneke remake Funny Games?
Haneke claims he had always wanted Funny Games to be seen widely by a U.S. audience as the film was commenting predominantly on violence in American cinema. So when he was offered the chance to direct an English language remake, he gladly accepted — on the condition that Naomi Watts played the lead.
Is Funny Games a disturbing movie?
Violence 6/10. Mostly offscreen. Offscreen violence includes a dog beaten to death (body seen from far off), a child being shot dead, and other disturbing content, and death. The only violence onscreen is when a man is shot with a shotgun, but this is shown in a flash.
What does the rewind scene in Funny Games mean?
Funny Games teases us with this by suggesting that it’s going to happen, but then uses the “rewind” moment to show that it was a fakeout, and to call attention to the subversion of expectations.
What is the point of the movie Funny Games?
Michael Haneke’s “Funny Games” is a postmodern take on the realistic illusion of film. It is a self-referential exploration of the truth-value of artificial images and the “entertainment” of violence.
Is there a sequel to Funny Games?
Funny Games II (Short 2011) – IMDb.
Is Funny Games a shot-for-shot remake?
The most well-known and well-liked example of this is probably Michael Haneke’s 2007 film Funny Games. It’s a shot-for-shot remake of his own movie from 10 years prior. However while the original is set in Austria and is in German language, the remake is set in America and is in English.
Does Funny Games have nudity?
Tense scenes include threats of violence, pursuit of a victim through dark hallways, and sexual taunting (which culminates in a woman being forced to strip, though no nudity is shown).
Is Funny Games 1997 worth watching?
Watching “Funny Games” (1997) directed by Michael Haneke for the first time was an unforgettable visceral experience. It was the horror that really scared, devastated, and stayed with me long after the final scene was over.
Why does Michael Haneke not provide his audience with a cathartic moment in Funny Games?
Haneke refuses to play to the expectations of an audience that wants to see a violent movie (which is, no doubt, the audience being targeted by the film’s marketers), providing tension (manipulation) but not delivering the goods.
What happened at the end of Funny Games?
At the end of the film, Paul again smirks triumphantly at the audience. As a self-aware character, he is able to go against the viewers’ wishes and make himself the winner of the film. After killing Anna, Peter and Paul argue about the line between reality and fiction.